BLUF: Booz Allen Hamilton's GSA task order for threat analysis, training, and readiness support has reached $1,066,387,866 in total obligations, according to an August 24, 2026 modification on USAspending.gov.

The task order, PIID 47QFCA20F0014, was signed June 26, 2020, under the multiple-award OASIS indefinite-delivery contract GS00Q14OADU108, competed via solicitation 47QFCA20R0002 under full and open competition. The contract description on file with the General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) covers "real-time, comprehensive threat analysis and assessment, training development and delivery, readiness and modernization support, and logistics and equipment services."

Why it matters: This is the task order publicly reported by Washington Technology in July 2020 as the Emergent Threat Training and Readiness Capability (ET2RC) contract — a five-year, Army Forces Command task order awarded through GSA OASIS at a reported $937 million ceiling, with three companies competing for the work. The gap between that $937 million figure reported at award and the $1.07 billion now recorded as obligated on USAspending reflects funding added over the life of the task order. The contract's period of performance on record ended June 25, 2025, so the August 2026 modification reflects post-performance-period funding activity — a reminder that obligated totals on large IDIQ task orders can keep moving well after the base period of performance closes out.

By the numbers:

• Total obligation: $1,066,387,866
• Reported 2020 award ceiling: $937 million (Washington Technology)
• Period of performance: June 26, 2020 – June 25, 2025
• Latest modification: August 24, 2026
• Parent IDIQ: OASIS, contract GS00Q14OADU108
• NAICS: 541330 (Engineering Services)
• Contract type: Cost Plus Award Fee
• Customer: Army Forces Command

The task order funds Army readiness and modernization work, including training-development and threat-assessment support, delivered under GSA's Federal Acquisition Service using the OASIS vehicle rather than a direct Army contract.

Source: USAspending.gov